Wednesday, September 29, 2010

Babies in the News

I read two fascinating articles in the New York Times today.

The first one discussed the increased rate of caesarean sections in the US (1 in 3 births). It's now the most common surgery performed in the United States although our rates are nothing compared to Brazil (70%) or China (60%).

 The second article was a explanation of new studies that suggest that childhood obesity may have some links to how much weight women gain during pregnancy.


Here are the two articles, in full (after the jump):

Majority of Caesareans Are Done Before Labor








A new study suggests several reasons for the nation’s rising Caesarean section rate, including the increased use of drugs to induce labor, the tendency to give up on labor too soon and deliver babies surgically instead of waiting for nature to take its course, and the failure to allow women with previous Caesareans to try to give birth vaginally.
Thirty-two percent of all births in the United States — nearly 1 in 3 — now occur by Caesarean section. The operations have been increasing steadily since 1996, setting records year after year, and have become the most common surgery in American hospitals. About 1.4 million Caesareans were performed in 2007, the latest year for which figures are available. The increases have caused debate and concern.
The concern arises because Caesareans pose a risk of surgical complications and research has found that they are more likely than normal births to cause problems that can put the mother back in the hospital and the infant in intensive care. Risks to the mother also increase with each subsequent Caesarean, because it raises the odds that the uterus will rupture in the next pregnancy, which can seriously harm both the mother and the baby.
Caesareans also increase the risk of dangerous abnormalities in the placenta during later pregnancies, which can cause hemorrhaging and lead to a hysterectomy. Repeated Caesareans can make it risky or even impossible to have a large family. In addition, costs for a Caesarean are nearly twice those for a vaginal delivery.
Most women who have had one or even two Caesareans can at least try to give birth vaginally, and studies have found that 60 to 80 percent succeed. But vaginal births after Caesarean sections have become increasingly uncommon.
Worries about the ever-increasing Caesarean rate led the National Institutes of Health to form a Consortium on Safe Labor, which performed a detailed analysis of electronic records from 228,668 births at 19 hospitals in the United States from 2002 to 2008. The study is the first to analyze how often Caesareans were performed before women went into labor (more than half the time) and how often after labor had begun.
The results were published this month by the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and described in a telephone briefing by two of the authors, Dr. Jun Zhang and Dr. S. Katherine Laughon, from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
Dr. Zhang said one thing that surprised him about the study was that a third of first-time mothers were having Caesareans. Although it was known that the overall Caesarean rate was 32 percent, some of that was thought to be due to repeat Caesareans.
The main reason for a Caesarean was a prior Caesarean. But in women who have not had Caesareans before, one factor that may increase the risk is the use of drugs to induce labor. The practice has been increasing, and the study found that induced labor, compared with spontaneous labor, was twice as likely to result in a Caesarean.
In the study, 44 percent of the women who were trying vaginal delivery had their labor induced. When Caesareans were done after induction, half were performed before the woman’s cervix had dilated to six centimeters, “suggesting that clinical impatience may play a role,” the authors wrote. Full dilation is 10 centimeters, and a Caesarean before six centimeters may be too soon, the researchers said.
Like other studies, this one found that few women were offered a chance to try vaginal birth after Caesarean.
“Physicians and patients may be less committed” to the vaginal births, the authors said.
Dr. Zhang said it appeared likely that the Caesarean rate in this country would keep increasing, though he said he hoped it would never match the rates in Brazil (70 percent) or China (60 percent). If there is any hope of reducing the rate in the United States, or at least slowing the increase, he and his colleagues said, the key is to lower the rate among first-time mothers and increase the rate of vaginal birth after Caesarean.


And the second one:



Weight Problems May Begin in the Womb








You may think you know why Americans continue to get fatter and develop obesity-related diseases. But the explanation may start long before people have an opportunity to eat too much of the wrong foods and exercise too little.
Increasing evidence indicates that the trouble often starts in the womb, when women gain more weight than is needed to produce a healthy, full-size baby. Excessive weight gain in pregnancy, recent findings show, can result in bigger-than-average babies who are prenatally programmed to become overweight children — who, in turn, are more likely to develop diabetes, heart disease and cancer later in life.
The Institute of Medicine, the health arm of the National Academy of Sciences, reported last year that more than a third of normal-weight women and more than half of overweight and obese women gain more weight than is recommended during pregnancy. Over all, “fewer than 40 percent of pregnant women gain only the recommended amount of weight during their pregnancy,” Dr. Sylvia R. Karasu and Dr. T. Byram Karasu report in their new book “The Gravity of Weight.”
Not ‘In the Genes’
While genes play a role in weight issues for some people, recent studies indicate that genetics is not the main reason babies are born too fat. Rather, the new evidence suggests that in addition to gaining significantly more weight than is recommended during pregnancy, more women now start out fatter before they become pregnant.
The latest study controlled for the effects of genetics by studying consecutive pregnancies among more than half a million women. The analysis, by Janet Currie, a health economist at Columbia University, and Dr. David S. Ludwig of Children’s Hospital Boston, found a consistent association between the amount of weight a woman gained during pregnancy and the birth weight of her babies.
Women who gained more than 53 pounds during a full-term pregnancy with one baby were more than twice as likely to have babies who weighed 9 or more pounds at birth than were women who gained only 18 to 22 pounds. For each kilogram (2.2 pounds) of weight gained by the pregnant mother, the baby’s birth weight increased by 7.35 grams (one-fourth of an ounce).
Because birth weight tends to predict body mass index later in life, “these findings suggest that excessive weight gain during pregnancy could raise the long-term risk of obesity-related disease in offspring,” the authors concluded in their report, published online in The Lancet on Aug. 5.
The analysis sought to rule out the effects of genetics on birth weight by comparing each married woman’s pregnancy weight gain and birth weight of her babies in successive pregnancies that occurred within a few years of each other (and thus were most likely to involve the same father). Although the authors did not know how much the women weighed before becoming pregnant each time, other studies have found that many women fail to lose all their pregnancy weight before they become pregnant again. Thus, they are likely to start out fatter and gain more during the next pregnancy.
In an accompanying editorial, Dr. Neal Halfon and Dr. Michael C. Lu of the Center for Healthier Children, Families and Communities at the University of California, Los Angeles, cited still another study, this one based on data gathered from parents and children in Britain. It found that at age 9, the children of women who had gained more weight than recommended by the Institute of Medicine were fatter than other children, more likely to become overweight, and had several risk factors for heart disease — including higherblood pressure and lower levels of protective HDL cholesterol — as well as poorer immune function.
This study, published in Circulation in June, found that a woman’s weight before pregnancy was even more important than excessive weight gain during pregnancy in predicting a number of risks for the baby: birth complications, excessive baby fat and “metabolic abnormalities associated with poor health outcomes, including childhood obesity,” as the editorial put it.
Dr. Halfon, a pediatrician, said in an interview, “The little changes in children’s metabolism tend to be compounded over time and become big changes in adults.”
The Recommendations
The latest recommendations from the Institute of Medicine, revised last year, suggest these pregnancy weight gains, as determined by a woman’s prepregnancy weight:
¶28 to 40 pounds for thin women, with a B.M.I. of 18.5 or lower.
¶25 to 35 pounds for normal-weight women, with a body mass index of 18.6 to 24.9.
¶15 to 25 pounds for overweight women, with a body mass index of 25 to 29.9.
¶11 to 20 pounds for obese women, with a body mass index of 30 or higher.
Dr. Lu, an obstetrician, said prepregnancy weights in nine states revealed significant increases in overweight and obesity between the periods 1993-94 and 2002-3. Even normal-weight women are now more likely to gain excessive amounts during pregnancy than were women who became pregnant in the 1990s, according to data from the national Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
According to data from the National Center for Health Statistics, since 1990 proportionately more women have gained more than 40 pounds in a singleton pregnancy.
Higher Birth Weights
The new findings suggest that Americans are now caught in a vicious cycle of increasing fatness, with prospective mothers starting out fatter, gaining more weight during pregnancy and giving birth to babies who are destined to become overweight adults.
“There are a lot more high-birth-weight babies being born,” Dr. Currie said in an interview, “and this may have something to do with the increase in overweight we’re now seeing in the population over all.”
When I was pregnant 40-odd years ago, a normal-weight woman was expected to keep her pregnancy weight gain to within 24 pounds. But, Dr. Currie said, about 20 years ago the concern about too many babies with low birth weights may have prompted many doctors to be less restrictive about how much weight women gained while pregnant.
“We still see a lot of low-birth-weight babies, but the number of high-birth-weight babies has increased quite dramatically,” Dr. Currie said. “There’s no reason for a woman to gain more than 40 pounds with a single baby. We used to think babies in the womb were well protected, but we now know they are influenced by lots of things that will affect them later in life.”
She added, “The next frontier has to be the prepregnancy period. If we really want to improve the health of children, we have to get to mothers before they get pregnant.”
As Dr. Halfon said, “You can’t turn around in the nine months of pregnancy what’s been going on for many years of life. The preconception period is critical to placing pregnancy on a healthier trajectory.”




4 comments:

  1. I heard a news story a few weeks ago saying a study indicated that children born by caesarean are more likely to develop asthma. Something about bacteria they're exposed to in a "normal" birth. Crazy. Luckily, there's a good midwifery center, supported by the hospital and right across the street from the hospital... for our likely SOMEDAY use. Their need for caesarean rate is low, which only feeds the curiosity as to why they're so frequently done in the hospital.

    Have you watched Ricki Lake's documentary on birthing in America? I'm not comfortable with the idea of home birth, but it's definitely interesting on many other levels to watch. Netflix has it on internet streaming, if you have that.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey Sonja, I heard about the study regarding obesity too...haven't read the article, but I know breast feeding has a "protective effect" against obesity, so maybe you could compromise and continue to eat plenty of grilled cheeses knowing that you will probably breast feed ;) I'm sure all the real scientists out there would roll their eyes at me right now...

    ReplyDelete
  3. Dude...Grilled cheese is actually a fairly healthy food. :) It was on my GD diet. It has to have the right cheese to bread ratio though and only a light covering of butter on the bread. So, eat your GC guilt free!!! :)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks, gals, I appreciate the calming words. I have a tendency to read articles and overreact, just a little bit. I think the added pressure of knowing that something you're doing could potentially influence more than just yourself is also not exactly helpful.

    ReplyDelete